German Acts   TM-Conqueror   Contact   Imprint   Links
Attorney-at-Law Michael Horak, graduate engineer (Electrical Engineering), LL.M. (European Law)
german-domains-domainlaw-udrp-adr-licence-antitrust-advertising-law-ec-ecj-food-trademark-search patent application representation epo european patent office represent lawyer attorney 


 

 

 

 

 

 

  Overview   Practice   IP Law   Computer Law   Media Law   Advertising Law   Trademark Applications   Sample Texts   Attorneys Fees   Court Rulings

 

patents-trademarks-copyright-europe patent law trademark law utility model law design law domain law plant law know how law copyright law

european attorney german ip law germany intellectual property law lawyer germany law firm germany ip law it law food law european law

ip-attorney-germany intellectual property attorney in germany and eupore ec lawyer law office ip law ip firm ip prosecution ip litigation media law antitrust law advertising law competition law unfair competition lawyer attorney ec competition law

patent-trademark-attorney-at-law patent law trade mark law design law lawyer agent european attorney domain name law udrp copyright law adr it law german commercial law company law pharma law adminishment law

 

 

 

>Start >Overview >Court Rulings >Competition law >BGH-Handy for 0
>Start

The judgement of the German Supreme Court – Docket No.: I ZR 187/97 – the judgement of the Regional Appeal Court in Duesseldorf of 8th October 1998 – “Mobile phone for EUR 0.00”

1. An offer presented in an advertisement to buy a mobile telephone for free or almost for free when a mobile phone contract is concluded does not constitute a free gift offer.

2. Such an eye-catching advertisement does not constitute an infringement of competition law under § 1 of the Unfair Competition Act in the form of excessive baiting.

3. Such an advertisement, however, is misleading and violates the Price Indication Regulation, if the costs ensuing for the consumer due to the conclusion of the mobile phone contract are not made clear to him. This means that the indication of costs related to network access must be placed in an area of the advertisement well visible for the customer. Furthermore, price indication must be legible and complete.

 

german-trademark-trade-mark-law-patents-utility-models-competition-solicitor-law-firm trade name law trade mark lawyer trademark prosecution trademark ltitgation deutsch english-lawyer-attorney-iplaw-ip-lawyer-it-law-itlawyer international law wipo domain law domain name law international registration ir mark ec mark community trademark english

ip-attorney-ip-lawyer german law german lawyer patent law patent application file patent lawyer print | trademark-law-patent-domain-design-utility-model-europe design law eu design community design law design right international design save | law-of-technics-multi-media-law-german-business-lawyer back | european-trademark-protection-german-trademarks-european-law enquiry


© 1998-2012 IP Attorney at law Michael Horak· Georgstr. 48 · 30159 Hannover · Germany
Fon: +49.511.357356.0 · Fax: +49.511.357356.29 · mailto:horak@iprecht.de